B.Rajitha v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 15200 of 2010 (Y)
PETITIONER(S):
B. RAJITHA, SUNDARA BHAVANAM, KIZHAKKATHIL AASRAMAM, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR, SMT.P.LISSY JOSE.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM.
3. THE CORPORATION OF KOLLAM, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.PRINCY XAVIER. R3 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS, SC.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.V.ASHA, J.
W.P(C) No.15200 of 2010-Y
Dated this the 29th day of November, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ
Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- (P.V.ASHA, JUDGE)
rtr/
/true copy/
P.S to Judge
B. RAJITHA
THE STATE OF KERALA
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM
THE CORPORATION OF KOLLAM
P.V. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court