Writ petition dismissed as infructuous because the matter had become moot. No substantive legal propositions were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/29TH POUSHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 1404 of 2009 (P)
PETITIONER(S):
MALABAR FIRE WORKS OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, GECO COMPLEX, NADAKKAVU CROSS ROAD, CALICUT-673 011, REG. NO.S.518/2008, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY K.P. JAGADISH.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.MADHU, SRI.P.R.SHIBU.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOZHIKODE.
2. ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOZHIKODE.
3. THE CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, SEMINARI HILLS, NAGPUR.
4. THE JOINT CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, 140, MARSHALS ROAD, EGMORE, CHENNAI-600 008.
5. THE DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES SAFETY ORGANIZATION, KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN -37.
6. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1, R2 & R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB. R3 TO R5 BY ADV. SRI.N. NAGARESH, ASST. S.G. OF INDIA.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
W.P.(C).No.1404/2009
Dated this the 19th Day of January, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition
is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
ms
\True copy//
P.S to Judge
MALABAR FIRE WORKS OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOZHIKODE
THE STATE OF KERALA
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
