This order directs the 1st respondent to reconsider the petitioner's revision petition filed before it within four months by affording an opportunity of hearing. The writ petition is disposed of without any observation on merits.
Directed the 1st respondent to consider the revision petition within four months by affording an opportunity of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/15TH CHAITHRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 13008 of 2016 (A)
PETITIONER(S):
JOSY JOHN, AGED 37 YEARS WIFE OF REJI THANKACHAN UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT M N U P SCHOOL, NEDUMPAIKULAM KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DIST. 691 501
BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT 696 506
4. THE MANAGER, M N U P SCHOOL, NEDUMPAIKULAM KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 501
5. THE HEADMASTER, M N U P SCHOOL NEDUMPAIKULAM, KOTTARAKKARA KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 501
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J RAJASREE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 13008 of 2016 (A)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
EXT.P1 COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1.6.10
EXT.P2 COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER 2010-11 DATED 27.5.11 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE DIRECTOR DATED 9.7.15, WITHOUT ANNEXURE
EXT.P4 COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVT. DATED 15.3.16, WITHOUT ANNEXURE.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:
NIL
// TRUE COPY //
P.A TO JUDGE
SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== W.P.(C) No.13008 of 2016 - A
====================== Dated this the 4th day of April, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P4 revision petition filed before the 1st respondent. The revision petition is filed on 15.03.2016.
will have to look at the revision petition filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
SB/04/04/2016
// true copy //
P.A to Judge.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 1st respondent is directed to consider the revision petition filed by the petitioner.
Josy John
The State of Kerala
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
