Asgar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed the writ petition seeking a direction to consider a representation and issue a transit permit for dead and windfallen trees, noting that an order on the claim was passed in 2006 which was not challenged.
What did the court decide?
No further reliefs can be granted as the claim was rejected in an order of 6.3.2006.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2016/12TH PHALGUNA, 1937
WP(C).No. 12710 of 2005 (K)
PETITIONER(S):
ASGAR, FARM HOUSE, PARASUVAKAL P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SRI.K.I.SAGEER.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD.
3. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NENMARA, NENMARA FOREST DIVISION, NENMARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to consider representation and issue transit permit for dead trees deserves allowance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ASGAR
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD
- respondent
DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NENMARA
- respondent
DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, PALAKKAD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court