Petitioner challenged non-consideration of his representation regarding a transfer order. Court directed the 1st respondent to consider the representation after hearing affected parties within one month. No observation on merits.
Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation after hearing affected parties within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/22ND POUSHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 119 of 2016 (L)
PETITIONER:
ANEESH M.V. AGED 36 YEARS S/O PONNAN, METER READER DISTRIBUTION SECTION NO.I, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY KOZHIKODE- RESIDING AT KUTTANBALATH PARAMBA HOUSE FEROKE PO, KOZHIKODE-673631
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR SMT.ANITHA MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALABHAVAN VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033
2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (GENERAL) KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN VELLAYAMBALAMTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.H. DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY KOZHIKODE-673 605
R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 119 of 2016 (L)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE RERPESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 1/1/16
EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE (DISCHARGE ADVICE) ISSUED TO THE PEWTITIONER FROM MMS HOSPITAL DT. 27/11/15
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
W.P.(C) No. 119 of 2016 (L)
Dated this the 12th day of January, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P2 representation dated 01.01.2016 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.
The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
jjj 12/1/16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the representation submitted by the petitioner should be considered by the 1st respondent after hearing affected parties.
Aneesh M.V.
The Kerala Water Authority
The Deputy Chief Engineer (General) Kerala Water Authority
The Executive Engineer P.H. Division, Kerala Water Authority
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
