A contempt of court petition was heard on 11.01.2016. The petitioner was absent without representation. The court dismissed the contempt proceedings due to lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/21ST POUSHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1911 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).18400/2015
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 18400/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 06-07-2015
PETITIONER/PETITIONERIN WPC 18440/15 :
T.V SASIDHARAN NAIR, AGED 62 YEARS S/O.VASUDEVAN NAIR THAZHATHEL HOUSE, DEVARUPARA P.O., POOCHAPRA IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 558.
BY ADV. SRI.S.K.MURALEEDHARA KAIMAL
RESPONDEN/3RD RESPONDENT IN WPC 18440/15:
V. RATHEESH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI PAINAVU P.O., - 685 588.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.A. FAYAZ
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1911 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).18400/2015
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :-
| ANNEXURE A1 | - | COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.07.2015 IN WP(C) NO.18400/2015 (Y) OF THIS COURT. |
|---|---|---|
| ANNEXURE A2 | - | COPY OF THE REGISTERED NOTICE TO THE RESPONDENT THROUGH PETITIONER'S COUNSEL. |
| ANNEXURE A3 | - | COPY OF THE DULY ACKNOWLEDGED CARD DATED 17.10.2015. |
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
sp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
----------------------------------
C.O.C. No.1911 of 2015-S In
W.P(C). No.18400 of 2015-Y
---------------------------------Dated this the 11th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for
consideration on 04.01.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, when the matter is taken up, there is nobody to represent the petitioner.
In such circumstance, the contempt case is dismissed.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE. //True Copy//
P.A. to Judge.
sp/11/01/16
T.V SASIDHARAN NAIR
V. RATHEESH
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
