State Planning Board Staff Co.Op.Society v. State Planning Board
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/27TH PHALGUNA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.11581 of 2006 (D)
PETITIONER(S):-
STATE PLANNING BOARD STAFF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.4352, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,
STATE PLANNING BOARD STAFF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.4352, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 004
(K.GIRISHKUMAR, RESEARCH OFFICER, STATE PLANNING BOARD, CIVIL STATION, KASARGOD).
BY ADVS.SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN
SRI.V.V.MATHEW
SMT.P.RETNAKUMARI.
RESPONDENT(S):
ADDL.4TH RESPONDENT IMPLEADED:
ADDL.R4. SUB TREASURY OFFICER, VELLAYAMBALAM.
[ADDITIONAL 4TH RESPONDENT IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 08.10.2015]
R1, R2 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL.
R4 BY ADVS. SRI.S.M.PREM SMT.K.P.SANTHI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. Vinod Chandran, J
W.P.(C) No.11581 of 2006-D
Dated this the 17th day of March, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the entire loan has been repaid and the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition would stand dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/-
[ true copy ]
State Planning Board Staff Co-operative Society Ltd. No. 4352 (Through its Secretary) and K. Girishkumar
State Planning Board (Through its Member Secretary)
State of Kerala (Through Secretary to Government, Planning and Economic Affairs Department)
A.C. Jose
Sub Treasury Officer, Vellayambalam
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court