Sunil.T.v v. Dist.Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ appeal filed against an order in WP(C).No.11645/2009 was dismissed because the prayer was not pressed by the learned counsel for the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/8TH MAGHA, 1937
WA.No. 980 of 2009 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.11645/2009 DATED 07-04-2009.
APPELLANT/WRIT PETITIONER:
SUNIL T.V., AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. VIJAYAN, THAIPARAMBATH HOUSE, AYYAPPANKAVU P.O., MULAYAM VIA., THRISSUR DISTRICT, (RC OWNER OF KL-17/B-6131).
BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunil T.V.
- respondent
District Collector
- respondent
Sub-Inspector of Police
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court