Disposed
V.K.Janardhanan Nair v. C.Vijanaymohan
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1897/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/8TH MAGHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1897 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).37718/2015
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 37718/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 15/12/2015
PETITIONER IN WPC.NO.37718/2015:
V.K.JANARDHANAN NAIR AGED 47 YEARS S/O.KESAVAN NAIR, PROPRIETOR, VKJ & COMPANY VADAKKEPUTHANPURA VEETTIL, VARAPETTY PO KOTHAMANGALAM-686 691, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH
RESPONDENT/8TH RESPONDENT IN THE WPC.NO.37718/2015:
C.VIJAYAMOHAN S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR POLICE STATION PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689 645.
BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ
&
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
*** * * * * * * * * * * * *** Cont.Case (C) No.1897 of 2015
Dated this the 28th day of January 2016
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, CJ
This contempt case has been filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 15/12/2015 in W.P.C.No.37718/2015.
In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we close this contempt case.
(sd/-)
(ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
True Copy PA to Judge
jsr/28/01/16
V.K. Janardhanan Nair
C. Vijayamohan
Ashok Bhushan
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court