This writ appeal was dismissed as infructuous on admission on 25.01.2016 without recording reasons, as the underlying judgment had already become неделимъ or without further operative necessity.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous and disposed of without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/5TH MAGHA, 1937
WA.No. 2743 of 2009 ( ) IN WP(C).31827/2006
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 31827/2006 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 20-03-2009
APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS:
BY ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE)
SRI.S.SUJIN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & A.HARIPRASAD, JJ.
W.A.No.2743 of 2009
Dated this the 25th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
Counsel for the appellants submitted that the appeal has become
infructuous.
Submission is recorded. Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.
A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.
cks
P.V.NEELAKANTAN NAIR
ANNIE PHILOMINA P.A.
STATE OF KERALA
ANTONY DOMINIC
A. HARIPRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
