Roshan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Pending writ petition challenging appointment orders on daily wages in additional vacancy was not challenged. Appointment was in violation of Govt. order prohibiting filling vacancies after 31.03.2011.
What did the court decide?
Writ Appeal dismissed without interference in the Single Judge's order declining relief.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/15TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WA.No. 238 of 2015 () IN WP(C).2609/2014
JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 2609/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 19-12-2014
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
ROSHAN THOMAS
U.P.S.A., S.H.H.S., MYLAPRA
PATHANAMTHITTA, RESIDING AT KUTHEANETHU HOUSE PAYYANAMON PO, KONNY
BY ADVS.SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY
SRI.POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDULKAREEM SRI.K.N.KUMARASWAMY SARMA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the W.A. should be allowed in view of the impugned orders rejecting the initial approval of the appointment made on daily wages despite the vacancy being filled after 31.03.2011.
Whether the W.A. should be allowed in view of the impugned orders rejecting the initial approval of the appointment made on daily wages despite the vacancy being filled after the closure of additional
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ROSHAN THOMAS
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- respondent
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PATHANAMTHITTA
- respondent
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court