Nasar.a v. Abdul Jabbar U.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the writ appeal filed by Nasar.A. S/o. Ahammed, as it had become infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Writ appeal dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2016/2ND MAGHA, 1937
WA.No. 2057 of 2010 ( ) IN WP(C).36622/2009
--------------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN R.P.No.39/2010 IN WP(C) 36622/2009 DATED 25-01-2010
APPELLANT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT :-
NASAR.A. S/O. AHAMMED, ARANAKKADA HOUSE, KAVARATHI ISLANDS UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP.
BY ADVS.SRI.BABU S. NAIR SMT.M.T.SHEEBA SRI.K.RAKESH
RESPONDENT(S)/REVIE PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1, 2 & 4 :-
1. ABDUL JABBAR U.C., S/O. MUHAMMED MASTER, UKKAYYACHETTA, KADAMATH ISLANDS UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nasar.A.
- respondent
Abdul Jabbar U.C.
- respondent
The Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep
- respondent
The Lakshadweep Development Corporation Ltd.
- respondent
Cheriyakoya.K.K.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court