Contempt of Court case where the petitioner submitted that compliance with the impugned order was already made. The Court recorded the submission and closed the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2016/2ND MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 731 of 2015 (S) IN Mat.Appeal.336/2014 -------------------------------------------------------JUDGMENT IN Mat.Appeal 336/2014 DATED 10.10.2014
PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT :-
KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED 31 YEARS S/O.DAMODHARAN NAIR, PRASADAM, JUNIOR JANATHA ROAD VYTTILA P.O., KOCHI-682 019.
BY ADV. SMT.P.K.RADHIKA
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT :-
SHALINI K.V., AGED 27 YEARS W/O.KRISHAN PRASAD, PRASADAM JUNIOR JANATHA ROAD VYTTILA P.O., KOCHI-682 019 (NOW RESIDING AT ANUGRAHA DREAM NAGAR, ERIMAYUR P.O., PALAKKAD-678 546).
BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
jvt
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
Cont. Case (C) No.731 of 2015
Dated this the 22nd day of January 2016
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, CJ.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order against which non-compliance is complained of, has already been complied with and this contempt case may be closed.
Recording the said submission and close this contempt
case.
Sd/-
ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
J UDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Jvt/23.1.16.
Krishna Prasad
Shalini K.V.
Ashok Bhushan
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
