This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/27TH PHALGUNA, 1937
WA.No. 1697 of 2008 (E) IN WP(C).14469/2007
--------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).14469/2007 DATED 22-07-2008
APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER :-
C.G.ZACHARIA, AGED 77, S/O.LATE GEORGE CHENNUMKARA, WARD NO.IV, EDATHUA P.O. EDATHUA VILLAGE, KUTTANADU TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DIST.
BY ADVS.SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.T.A.ABDUL RASHEED
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS :-
1. THE EDATHUA GRAMA PANCHAYATH BY ITS SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT OFFICE, EDATHUA.
2. THE SECRETARY, EDATHUA GRAMA PANCHAYAT.
3. THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVT. INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, HEALTH, ALAPPUZHA.
5. K.M.GEORGE, AGED 75, S/O.LATE MATHEW, KATTUMBHAGAM VEETTIL, EDATHUA P.O., EDATHUA VILLAGE, KUTTANADU TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.VINODKUMAR R3 & R4 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.I.DAVIS
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-032016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
W.A. No. 1697 of 2008
--------------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 17th day of March, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique, J
It is submitted by learned cousnel for the appellant that appellant is no more.
No steps have been taken despite time has been given from 9.2.2016. Hence the writ appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
sou.17/3.
C.G. Zacharia
The Edathua Grama Panchayath
K.M. George
ASHOK BHUSHAN
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
