V.K.Santhosh v. Syamala.S
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed this contempt case as the counsel for the petitioners submitted that the earlier direction had already been complied with.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/27TH PHALGUNA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1042 of 2015 (S) IN WA.1387/2013
-------------------------------------------------AGAINST THE NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA.1387/2013 DATED 02-04-2014
PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS 5, 7, 8, 13 :-
1. V.K.SANTHOSH, AGED 42 YEARS S/O.KUTTAPPAN NAIR, RAMABHAVANAM, KOOROPPADA P.O. KOTTAYAM - 686 029.
2. V.S. RATHEESH, AGED 55 YEARS S/O.SANKARAN POTTY, VAZHVELIMADOM KULANADA, PANDALAM.
3. D. RAJUMON, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.DANIAL KANJIKAL, MANJAKALA P.O., KOLLAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.K. Santhosh
- petitioner
V.S. Ratheesh
- respondent
Siamala.S.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court