Sreedharan v. Devaky
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was presumed not to be interested in the matter.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/19TH KARTHIKA, 1938
SA.No. 639 of 2001 (A)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS.167/1991 of MUNSIFF'S COURT, WADAKKANCHERRY DATED 11-08-1993
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS.49/1994 of II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR DATED 31-07-2000
APPELLANT(S):
SREEDHARAN, S/O.KIZHAKKUVEETTIL KUNJUNNY THALAKKOTTUKARA DESOM CHIRANELLUR VILLAGE TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
DEVAKY, D/O.KIZHAKKU VEETTIL KUNJUNNY & W/O.THAKKATTU PADIKAL KUTTAPPAN VENKIDANGU VILLAGE CHAVAKAD TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sreedharan
- respondent
Devaky
Coram
K. Harilal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court