Rajeevan v. Raman
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal by a brother challenging concurrent findings that he lacks title over disputed land which is instead possessed by his sibling and marked by rubber trees and a government-approved building in the respondent's name.
What did the court decide?
The appeal and all pending interlocutory applications are dismissed, dismissing O.S. No. 68/2005 and allowing O.S. No. 131/2006 in part.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/18TH KARTHIKA, 1938
RSA.No. 1066 of 2016 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 8/2015 of SUB COURT, MANJERI DATED 07-07-2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 68/2005 of MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI DATED 09-10-2009
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
RAJEEVAN, S/O. CHERUTHODAN UNNICHATHAN, AGED 55 YEARS, MEPPADOM, ALUNGALTHUNDIL, MAMPAD P.O., NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN
SMT.M.A.ZOHRA
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant has title and possession over the plaint B schedule property as claimed in O.S. No. 68/2005.
Whether the concurrent findings of the courts below regarding the identity of the survey numbers and possession of the properties require interference on a regular second appeal.
Whether any substantial question of law arises for consideration in this appeal regarding the disputed land and structures.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajeevan
- respondent
Raman
Coram
K. Harilal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court