Dismissed
Ismail v. Jabbar
Kerala HCSA/606/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This Second Appeal was dismissed due to non-prosecution, as the court found the appellant showed no interest in prosecuting the matter.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT:
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
¶4
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/25TH KARTHIKA, 1938
¶5
SA.No. 606 of 2002 (E )
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 04-04-2002 IN AS 101/1995 of II ADDL.D.C. & SESSIONS COURT, PALAKKAD
¶7
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 29-10-1994 IN OS 915/1990 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT, PALAKKAD
¶8
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
¶9
- ISMAIL, SON OF MOIDEENKUTTY ROWTHER,
¶10
- RESIDING AT KATTILPEEDIKA HOUSE, KODUNTHARAPILLY AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. (DIED; LRS IMPLEADED)
¶11
SUPPLEMENTAL APPELLANTS:
¶12
- SULEKHA, AGED 64 YEARS, W/O.LATE ISMAIL HAJI, KATTILPEEDIKA HOUSE, KODUNTHIRAPPALLY PIRAYIRI AMSOM, PALAKKAD.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ismail, son of Moideenkutty Rowther
- respondent
Jabbar, son of Makkai Rowther
Coram
AI extract
K. Harilal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court