Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Luis Vs Rosily — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2016)

Home
Kerala HC
2016
Luis Vs RosilyLuis v. Rosily

Dismissed

Luis v. Rosily

Kerala HC3 Mar 2016SA/438/2000

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposal order dismissing a second appeal as not pressed for adjudication. No substantive reasoning or legal proposition is provided.

What did the court decide?

Second appeal dismissed as not pressed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2016/13TH PHALGUNA, 1937

SA.No. 438 of 2000 (B)

AS 185/1992 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 14-01-2000 OS 307/1989 OF MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 30-11-1991

APPELLANT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT/1ST DEFENDANT:

LUVIS, S/O.PARAPPULLY ANTONY, EAST CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN

RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANTS & RESPONDENTS 3 TO 8/PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS 2 TO 8:

1. ROSILY D/O.PARAPPULLY ANTONY, CHALAKUDY VILLAGE AND W/O.KIZHAKKEDATH ANTO, MANAVALASSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Luvis, S/O.Parappully Antony
respondent
Rosily, D/O.Parappully Antony
respondent
Leela, S/o.Vadakkumbadan Thomas
respondent
Sunny @ Peterson
respondent
Rev.Sr.Viveena

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 3 Mar 2016 · March
Registered: 20 May 2000
Case no.: SA/438/2000

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from P.b.suresh Kumar

Hydrose Vs M.O.Jacob
2 Mar 2016
M.L.Kanthan Vs Gunasekharan
2 Mar 2016
A.Noorjahan Vs Ayisumma and Others
1 Mar 2016
Rajamma Vs M.v.Ramachandran
3 Mar 2016
Muttil Narayanan Vs Muttil Kallyani

Cite this judgement

Luis v. Rosily, SA/438/2000 (KL), decided on 3 March 2016.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

P.B. Suresh Kumar

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Second appeal dismissed as not pressed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The second appeal was dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed before the learned counsel for the appellant. No detailed judgment or legal analysis is furnished in this order.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

2. LEELA, SISTER OF 1ST RESPONDENT AND W/O.VADAKKUMBADAN THOMAS, MURINGOOR VILLAGE, DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

3. SUNNY @ PETERSON, BROTHER OF APPELLANT, EAST CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

4. REV.SR.VIVEENA, SISTER OF APPELLANT AND 3RD RESPONDENT, EAST CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

5. JACOB, BROTHER OF APPELLANT AND 3RD & 4TH RESPONDENTS DO. DO.

6. JOSE BROTHER OF APPELLANT AND 3RD TO 6TH RESPONDENTS DO. DO.

7. VINCENT BROTHER OF APPELLANT AND 3RD TO 7TH RESPONDENTS DO. DO.

8. ANTO BROTHER OF APPELLANT AND 3RD TO 8TH RESPONDENTS DO. DO.

9. ROSSA MOTHER OF APPELLANT AND RESPONDENTS DO. DO.

R1,2,5,6,7,8, BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR

THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

PJ

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

= = = = = = = = = = =

S.A.No.438 of 2000.

= = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 3^rd day of March, 2016.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the second appeal is not pressed. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this second appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR,

JUDGE.

Kvs/-

// true copy //

PA TO JUDGE.

Coram

AI extract

P.B. Suresh Kumar

CNR

KLHC010562682000

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

P.b.suresh Kumar

Disposal

DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED

3 Mar 2016

Dr Ajayakumar Vs K G Krishnan

4 Mar 2016