Hydrose v. M.O.Jacob
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated because the sole appellant was deceased and legal representatives had not come on record.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2016/12TH PHALGUNA, 1937
RSA.No. 26 of 2011 ( C )
AS 186/2009 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR OS 112/2008 of MUNSIFF COURT, NORTH PARAVUR
APPELLANT IN RSA/RESPONDENT IN AS - PLAINTIFF IN SUIT :
HYDROSE, S/O. BHAHARI, CHELLAPPATTU, PANAYIKULAM KARA, ALANGAD VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK- 683511.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SMT.GEETHA P.MENON SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN
RESPONDENT IN RSA-APPELLANT IN AS - DEFENDANT IN SUIT :
M.O. JACOB, S/O.OUSEPH, MANAKKAL VEETTIL, NEERICODE KOCHIRICKKAL KODUVAZHANGA, ALANGAD VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK - 683511
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hydros, S/O. Bahhari
- respondent
M.O. Jacob, S/O. Ouseph
Coram
P.B. Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court