A.a.Swaminathan v. a.a.Madhavan
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed for want of presentation by the appellant. No other substantive decision or legal proposition was made in this order.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1938
RSA.No. 933 of 2014 (C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 31.3.2014 IN AS 339/2011 of II ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 27.10.2011 IN OS 117/2009 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
A.A.SWAMINATHAN, AGED 79 YEARS,
SON OF LATE APPU MANNADIAR, SIVAKRIPA BHAVANAM, VADAKKEKALAM, VADAVANUR P.O., CHITTUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.)
SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI SRI.S.M.PRASANTH
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.A. SWAMINATHAN
- respondent
A.A. MADHAVAN
Coram
K. HARILAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court