Thressiamma v. Annam
Case brief
What is this about?
A three-line order dismissing a Regular Second Appeal for non-prosecution, without any substantive reasoning on the merits of the dispute.
What did the court decide?
The Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1938
RSA.NO. 434 OF 2004 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16-10-2003 IN A.S. NO. 351 OF 2003 OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), THRISSUR
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29-08-1997 IN O.S. NO. 478 OF 1997 OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
------------------------------
M.V.THRESSIA, AGED 57 YEARS,
W/O. LATE OUSEPH @ KOCHAPPU, PLACHERY HOUSE, MURINGOOR THEKKUMURI VILLAGE, DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.V.Thressia
- respondent
Annam @ Annakutty
- respondent
Kathrena @ Cicily
- respondent
P.K.Paul
- respondent
P.K.Benny
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court