Dismissed
Paul Thomas Mampilli v. Velayudhan
Kerala HCRSA/80/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
RSA.No. 80 of 2016 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 53/2004 of ADDL.SUB COURT, KOCHI DATED 28-02-2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 153/2002 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOCHI DATED 31-01-2004
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANTS:
BY ADVS.SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY
SMT.K.K.JYOTHILAKSHMY
SRI.SANIL JOSE
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
VELAYUDHAN, AGED 62 S/O.VELU,KANJIRAKKATTU HOUSE, NEAR CHURCH ROAD, NARAKKAL P.O - 682 505.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.P.RAMNATH R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.RAJESH (KOTTAKKAL) R1 BY ADV. SEI.M.VARGHESE VARGHESE R1 BY ADV. SMT.UMA R.KAMATH
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. HARILAL, J.
R.S.A. No.80 of 2016 & C.M.Appln. No.54 of 2016
Dated this the 5th day of December, 2016
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Since the reason stated in the application seeking
condonation of delay is not satisfactory, the delay petition will stand dismissed. Hence, the appeal also will stand dismissed.
Sd/- (K. HARILAL, JUDGE)
aks/05/12
// True Copy //
PA to Judge
Paul Thomas Mampilli
George Mampilli
Velayudhan
K. Harilal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court