Disposed
Santhakumari v. Prasannakumary
Kerala HCRSA/295/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
RSA.No. 295 of 2014 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 21/2011 of SUB COURT, THIRUVALLA DATED 25-01-2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 330/2003 of MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVALLA
APPELLANT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:-:
SANTHAKUMARI, AGED 70 YEARS W/O.G.K.PANICKER, QUARTERS NO.C.S. 10 COLONY, SECTOR 306, CHANDIGARH, NOW RESIDING AT KRISHNAVILASAM KOVILAKOM, MATHILBHAGAM, THIRUVALLA.
BY ADV. SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/LEGAL HEIRS OF 3RD DEFENDANT & DEFENDANTS 2 AND 4 TO 6:-:
RSA.No. 295 of 2014
2
R1-R3 BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.VIJAYAKUMAR
SRI.M.RAJESH
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. HARILAL, J.
R.S.A. No.295 of 2014
Dated this the 5th day of December, 2016
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The matter in dispute has been settled between
the parties by entering into a compromise agreement, which is produced along with I.A. No.2850/2016. The terms of compromise and the plan attached along with the compromise petition will form a part of this judgment. Hence, the appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- (K. HARILAL, JUDGE)
aks/05/12
// True Copy //
PA to Judge
SANTHAKUMARI
PRASANNAKUMARY
SANDHYA S.PILLAI
SARANYA S.PILLAI
LEELA BHAI
SASIDHARAN
K. HARILAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court