M.Vasu v. Swamidas
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala reviewed the impugned order to clarify the legal meaning of 'simple injunction'. The Court held that the term includes both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions, not just prohibitory ones, and dismissed the review petition.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed with clarification that 'simple injunction' includes both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1938
RP.NO. 978 OF 2016 () IN OP(C).1119/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP(C) NO.1119/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 12.07.2016
REVIEW PETITIONERS:
1. M.VASU, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.NALLAM PURAKKAL MADHAVAN, RESIDE AT NEAR HEAD POST OFFICE, MANALI, PALAKKAD.
2. M.ARJUNAN, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.NALLAM PURAKKAL MADHAVAN, RESIDE AT NEAR HEAD POST OFFICE, MANALI, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN
RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the expression 'simple injunction' in the impugned order limits it to prohibitory injunction only, or if it includes mandatory injunctions as well.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. VASU
- petitioner
M. ARJUNAN
- respondent
SHRI. SWAMIDAS
- respondent
ANNA MMU
- respondent
MARIA SEBASTIAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court