Jyothi v. Leelamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed two regular second appeals held not pressed, stating the learned counsel for the appellants abandoned the submission.
What did the court decide?
The second appeals were dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/7TH MAGHA, 1937
RSA.No. 398 of 2009 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS. NO.132/2006 OF DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 25-11-2008. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS. NO. 443/2003 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 20-07-2006.
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
JYOTHI, THANNIMOOTTIL VEEDU, KALLELI MURI, ARUVAPPULAM VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK.
BY SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, SENIOR ADVOCATE.
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
LEELAMMA, AGED 49 YEARS, MAMPARAKUZHIYIL HOUSE, PERUNADU, NOW RESIDING AT MUKALUMURIYIL HOUSE, CHENNEERKARA MURI & VILLAGE.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jothy
- respondent
Leelamma
Coram
P.B.Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court