Sivan v. Prameela
Case brief
What is this about?
In RSA No. 1315 of 2013, the single judge dismissed the appeal by default due to lack of representation. The Kerala High Court later set aside this dismissed order and restored the appeal to the file based on a subsequent order without substantive adjudication on merits.
What did the court decide?
Set aside the order dismissing the appeal for default; restore the appeal to the file.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937
RSA.No. 1315 of 2013 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS NO.33/2005 of SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM DATED 08-07-2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 492/2003 of MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPPALAM DATED 18-12-2004
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS, DEFENDANTS:
1. SIVAN, AGED 46 YEARS S/O CHEERATHODIL VEETTIL RAMAN, S.R.K. NAGAR P.O PALAPPURAM AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK
2. SUJA SIVAN, AGED 37 YEARS W/O SIVAN, S.R.K. NAGAR, P.O- PALAPPURAM AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK
BY ADVS.SRI.PRAKASH P.GEORGE SRI.SADER E.REAZ SRI.ACHUTH KYLAS
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sivan
- appellant
Suja Sivan
- respondent
Prameela
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court