In a criminal revision petition, the Kerala High Court dismissed the petition after accepting the petitioner's request to withdraw it based on an out-of-court amicable settlement reached during mediation.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; memorandum of agreement noted to form part of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/28TH POUSHA, 1937
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1528 of 2013 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A. NO.445/2011 OF II ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 26-02-2013. AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC. NO.53/2008 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-V, KOZHIKODE DATED 25-06-2011.
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
A.P. SHARBEENA, D/O.SAITHU, SHAREENA MANZIL HOUSE, AMBALAPURATH, FEROKE AMSOM DESOM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. SAJJAD SAHEER, S/O. MOIDEEN KOYA, KUNIYIL HOUSE, ERAMATHPARAME, CHERUVANNUR P.O., KOLATHARA, KOZHIKODE TALUK, PIN-673 655.
2. K. KABEER, S/O. MOIDEEN KOYA, KUNIYIL HOUSE, ERAMATHPARAME, CHERUVANNUR P.O., KOLATHARA, KOZHIKODE TALUK, PIN-673 655.
3. ABDUL AZEEZ, S/O. MOIDEEN KOYA, 19/963A, SHABANU MANZIL, KUNIYIL HOUSE, PALLURUTHI, COCHIN- 682 006.
4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI- 682 031.
R1 TO R3 BY ADVS. SRI.P.T.DINESH
SRI.K.A.ABDUL NISTAR. R4 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SHEEBA M.T.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P. UBAID, J.
Crl.R.P.No.1528 of 2013
Dated this the 18th day of January, 2016
O R D E R
It is submitted from both sides that the parties have come to terms amicably in mediation, and the parties have signed an agreement. The original memorandum of agreement signed by the parties is before this Court, as forwarded from the mediation centre. In view of the amicable settlement made out of court, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C.
The submission is accepted. Accordingly, in view of the settlement made by the parties in mediation this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The memorandum of agreement signed by the parties will form part of the order. The parties are permitted to take back the documents, if necessary, from the court below.
P. UBAID, JUDGE
sd
A.P. SHARBEENA
SAJJAD SAHEER
K. KABEER
ABDUL AZEEZ
STATE OF KERALA
P. UBAID
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
