Cleetus v. Vakko(Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant moved the High Court of Kerala for permission to withdraw the regular second appeal. The Court granted permission, thereby dismissing the appeal as withdrawn, and directed return of records.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; records directed to be returned to the trial court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/6TH KARTHIKA, 1938
RSA.No. 1041 of 2006 (G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 06-03-2006 IN AS 184/2004 of I ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM
AGAINST THE FINAL JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 22-07-2003 IN IA 2154/1999 IN OS 284/1986 of PRL. MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF::
CLEETUS, S/O.SOURI,
THERIPARAMBIL HOUSE, RESIDING AT VENNOOR,, ALATHUR, MELADOOR POST, MALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.ASP.KURUP
SRI.SADCHITH.P.KURUP
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Cleetus
- respondent
Vakko
- respondent
Chori
- respondent
Jose
- respondent
Annamkutty
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court