The appeal was disposed of due to a report from the District Mediation Centre confirming that the dispute had been settled between the parties via an agreement.
The appeal was disposed of in view of the settlement reached between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/5TH KARTHIKA, 1938
RSA.No. 618 of 2009 (F)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 04-02-2009 IN AS 125/2005 of DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 31-05-2005 IN OS 125/1999 of SUB COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANT 1 & 2:
BY ADVS.SRI.D.SAJEEV
SMT.LIGEY ANTONY
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
NARAYANANKURUP GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, USHASANDHYAMANDIRATHIL, PANNIVIZHA MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.SANEESH KUMAR
SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNAN
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OKB
K.HARILAL, J.
R.S.A. No.618 of 2009
Dated this the 27th day of October, 2016
JUDGMENT
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
This appeal was referred to the District Mediation Centre, Pathanamthitta to explore the possibility of settlement by way of mediation. The Nodal Officer has filed a report stating that the matter in dispute has been settled between the parties and a copy of the Memorandum of Agreement is also produced along with the report.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand closed.
Sd/K.HARILAL, Judge.
okb
PARAMESWARA KURUP RAVEENDRA KURUP
VALSALAKUMARI
NARAYANANKURUP GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR
K.HARILAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
