Disposed
State of Kerala v. M.G.Ramachandran Nair
Kerala HCRP/960/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/7TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938 RP.No. 960 of 2016 (C) IN WP(C).39430/2015 -------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 39430/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 23-12-2015
sm
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
R.P. No. 960 of 2016
Dated this the 28th day of November, 2016
O R D E R
In the light of the order of this Court dated 15.11.2016 and the subsequent Order No.EFL10148/2011 dated 25.11.2016 passed by the Custodian (Ecologically Fragile Lands), this Court is of the view that the review petition can be closed with liberty to the writ petitioners to challenge the notification or the order as referred above in accordance with law.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
bka/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition should be closed with liberty to the writ petitioners to challenge the subsequent order.
The State of Kerala rep. by Secretary, Department of Forest
Divisional Forest Officer Thiruvananthapuram
Custodian (Ecologically Fragile Lands) and Chief Conservator of Forest
Tahsildar Nedumangad
Village Officer Thenoor
M.G. Ramachandran Nair
A. Muhamed Mustaque
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court