Dismissed
Sasi v. Aravndakashan Nair
Kerala HCRP/886/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937
RP.No. 886 of 2012 (G)
THE JUDGMENT IN RSA. NO.345/2012 DATED 09-03-2012.
PETITIONER/1ST APPELLANT:
2. AJITHA SASI, W/O.LATE SASI, AGED 47 YEARS, DEVASWOM KALATHIL, THEKKEKARA MURI, CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
3. ARIJITH SASI, S/O.LATE SASI, AGED 23 YEARS, DEVASWOM KALATHIL, THEKKEKARA MURI, CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
4. ARYALAKSHMI SASI, D/O.LATE SASI, AGED 19 YEARS, DEVASWOM KALATHIL, THEKKEKARA MURI, CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT AND APPELLANTS 2 TO 5:
1. ARAVNDAKASHAN NAIR, S/O.SREEDHARAN PILLAI, MOTTITHARA (SARASWATHY NIVAS), THEKKEKARA MURI, CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA-688 505.
RP.No. 886 of 2012
2. SHAJI, S/O.MADHAVAN, DEVASWOM KALATHIL, THEKKEKARA MURI, CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT -688 505.
3. BEENA, W/O.KRISHNAMOORTHY, DEVASWOM KALATHIL, THEKKEKARA MURI, CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT- 688 505.
4. SHAYM KUMAR, S/O.KRISHNAMOORTHY, DEVASWOM KALATHIL, THEKKEKARA MURI, CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT- 688 505.
5. NIMMY, D/O.KRISHNAMOORTHY,
R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.AZAD BABU. R2 TO R5 BY ADV. SRI.P.KESAVAN NAIR.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
R.P. No.886 of 2012
in
R.S.A. No.345 of 2012
Dated 30th November, 2015.
O R D E R
There is no representation for the review petitioner. The review petition, in the circumstances, is dismissed for default. All the interlocutory applications in the review petition are closed.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
tgs
The Review Petition 886/2012 is restored to file as per order dated 23/12/2015 in M.J.C.452/2015 in R.P.886/2012 in R.S.A.345/2012.
Sd/- Registrar (Judicial)
ASASI, S/O.MADHAVAN
AJITHA SASI
ARIJITH SASI
ARYALAKSHMI SASI
ARAVERNDAKASHAN NAIR
SHAJI
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court