Joy Varghese v. P. Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
The contempt petition filed under WP(C) No. 9883/2016 was disposed of as the court found that the respondents had already complied with the directions given in the judgment dated 22-03-2016, leading to the closure of the matter.
What did the court decide?
Closure of the contempt petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/3RD KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1163 of 2016 () IN WP(C).9883/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 9883/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 22-03-2016.
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 10, 15 & 16 IN WPC:
1. JOY VARGHESE, AGED 55 YEARS, THETTAYIL HOUSE, CHALAKUDY P.O., THRISSUR.
2. FRANCHO, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.FRANCIS, KAITHARATH HOUSE, ELINJIPRA P.O., CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR.
3. SHONY, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, ELUVATHINGAL HOUSE, ANNANAD P.O., MURINGOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SMT.P.R.REENA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Joy Varghese
- petitioner
Francho
- petitioner
Shony
- respondent
P. Mathew
- respondent
Usha Parameswaran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court