Suja Mary John v. Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
On a review petition challenging a lower court judgment regarding educational scheme benefits, the High Court held the petition non-maintainable as it attempted a rehearing outside review grounds.
What did the court decide?
Review petition held non-maintainable and dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/19TH CHAITHRA, 1938
RP.No. 325 of 2016 (C) IN WP(C).4625/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4625/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 03-03-2016
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SUJA MARY JOHN, AGED 39 YEARS, CHEERAKUNNEL, MURANI, MALLAPALLY EAST P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
BY ADVS. SRI.T.P.DEYANANTHAN SRI.A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PANICKER
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. MANAGER, CMS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL, KOTTAYAM - 686 001
2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVALLA PATHANAMTHITA 689 645
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review petition is maintainable on grounds akin to a rehearing when new scheme considerations were already adjudicated.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suja Mary John
- respondent
Manager, CMS Corporate Management School, Kottayam
- respondent
The District Educational Officer, Thiruvalla
- respondent
The Deputy Director of Education, Pathanamthitta
- respondent
The Director of Public Instruction, Jagathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court