In this review petition, the Kerala High Court held that the mere pendency of a review petition in a related matter is not a ground for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and the petition was dismissed.
The review petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/3RD ASHADHA, 1938
RP.No. 223 of 2016 (K) ---------------------WP(C) 3507/2014 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT -----------
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1:
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, ERANHIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE, KERALA-673006, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (COMPLIANCE DIVISION)
BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL,SC, P.F.
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS:
1. CHEVAYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F.1245 P.O. NELLICODE, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE KOZHIKODE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK KOZHIKODE CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE-673020 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.
3. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO LABOUR AND REHABILITATION (E) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
R1 & R2 BY SRI.R.SUDHISH, SC,
BY SRI.P.P.JACOB
R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K. SUNITHA VINOD
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
P.V.ASHA J.
--------------------------------------------
R.P.No.223 of 2016
--------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of June, 2016
O R D E R
This review petition is filed on the ground that the judgment in Kerala Co-operative Employees Pension Board v. Udayakumar [2012 (3) KLT 820], which was relied on for allowing the writ petition has already been taken up by the review petitioner before the Division Bench by filing a review petition and the said review petition is pending consideration. No other ground is urged for reviewing the judgment.
of the judgment. If at all the review petition or the SLP
R.P.No.223 of 2016
2
which is stated to be filed by the State Pension Board, is allowed review petitioner will be free to take up appropriate action in terms of the judgment.
Under the above circumstances, the review petition is dismissed.
Sd/- P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
AS/24/06/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending review petition in a related matter is a valid ground for reviewing the judgment in the present writ petition on the grounds of error apparent on the face of the record.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kerala Co-operative Employees Pension Board v. UdayakumarReferred¶23
Kerala Co-operative Employees Pension Board v. Udayakumar [2012 (3) KLT 820]
1 provisions across 1 enactments
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
CHEVAYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
THE KOZHIKODE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK
THE STATE OF KERALA
P.V. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
