Single-line order dismissing a review petition filed against a judgment in W.P. (C) No. 28143/2007, holding that a re-hearing is not warranted in review proceedings.
Rejection of prayer for re-hearing and dismissal of the review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/20TH PHALGUNA, 1937
RP.No. 165 of 2016 () IN WP(C).28143/2007
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28143/2007 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:
VALSAMMA AGED 64 YEARS W/O.JOSE, THARAMUTTATH HOUSE, KULAPPURAM PERINGATTOOR, KOTHAMANGALAM
BY ADV. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN THE WRIT PETITION:
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM 682030
2. TAHSILDAR KOTHAMANGALAM 686691
3. VILLAGE OFFICER POTHANIKKAD 686671
4. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ASSESSMENT) SPECIAL CIRCLE III, ERNAKULAM, 682013
5. E V THOMAS EDATHATTIL HOUSE, EDATHATTIL HOUSE VADAKKETHARA VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY, TRICHUR 680501
6. DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALAKKAD 678001
BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.SUDHEESH KUMAR
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP NO.165/2016
APPENDIX
REVIEW PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT FILED BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBCID SIG II, ERNAKULAM.
//True Copy//
PS to Judge
Rp
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J. & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
================
R.P.No.165 of 2016
in
W.P. (C) No. 28143 of 2007
==================
Dated this, the 10th day of March, 2016
O R D E R
Shaffique, J.
This review petition has been filed seeking to review judgment dated 19/1/2016 in WP(C) No. 28143/2007. In the review petition, it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that all material points have not been considered.
Accordingly, we do not find any grounds to review the judgment and the same is dismissed.
Sd/-
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
Rp10/3/2016 //True Copy//
PS to Judge
Valsamma
District Collector, Ernakulam
Tahsildar Kothamangalam
Village Officer Pothanikkad
Assistant Commissioner(Assessment) Special Circle III, Ernakulam
E V Thomas
Ashok Bhushan
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
