A contempt of court case was admitted for hearing. The petitioner submitted that the impugned order had been complied with, leading the court to close the contempt proceedings without proceeding further.
Contempt case closed without proceeding further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/20TH PHALGUNA, 1937
Con. Case (C).No.398 of 2016 (S) IN WA.281/2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WA 281/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 18-02-2016.
PETITIONER(S):
C.N.RAMAN NAMBOOTHIRI, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN NAMBOOTHIRI, RESIDING AT CHERUTHOTTATHUMMANA (SREEVALSAM), VELAPPAYA,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN
SRI.A.MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA
RESPONDENT(S):
1. V.RAJALAKSHMI,
AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD,
OFFICE OF THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR-680 020.
2. HARIDAS,
THE SEPECIAL DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER,
COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD,
OFFICE OF THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD,
THRISSUR-680 020.
3. PRADEEP,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEVASWOM OFFICER, VELAPAYA DEVASWOM, VELAPAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE, THRISSUR-680 020.
BY SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL, SC, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
KRJ
Con. Case (C).No.398 of 2016 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
A:- COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT DATED 21.1.2016 IN W.P(C) NO.7855 OF 2015 AND W.P(C) NO.12438 OF 2015.
B:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.2.2016 IN WA. NO.281 OF 2016.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:-NIL
KRJ
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.O (C) No.398 of 2016
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of March, 2016
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, CJ
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order against which non-compliance is complained of is complied with
and the contempt case is not proceeded with. Hence, the contempt
case is closed.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE
krj.10/3/16
//true copy//
P.A to Judge
C.N. Raman Namboothiri
V. Rajalakshmi
Haridas
Deep
Ashok Bhushan
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
