S.K. Aniyan v. Santhamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a review petition arising from an order allowing an application for opposing expert opinion on a disputed will, holding no merit as the trial court retains ultimate evidence verification power.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/22ND POUSHA, 1937
RP.No. 1167 of 2015
OP(C) 1567/2015, DATED 01-09-2015
REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT:
S.K. ANIYAN, S/O. KAVIDASAN, SASTHAPARAMBIL, MUTHUKULAM SOUTH, ARATTUPUZHA VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688011.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.ANISON SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:
1. SANTHAMMA, D/O. PAPPY, SASTHAPARAMBIL, MUTHUKULAM SOUTH, ARATTUPUZHA VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688011.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petitioner can demonstrate an error apparent on the face of the record in allowing the application for expert opinion on the disputed will.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.K. Aniyan
- respondent
Santhamma
- respondent
Kavidasan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court