Abdul Nasar v. Kizhpatt Andrue
Case brief
What is this about?
First appeal regularly heard where parties executed a memorandum of settlement. The High Court of Kerala disposed of the appeal and ordered refund of court fee.
What did the court decide?
21. Court fee paid on memorandum of appeal refunded to appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/21ST ASWINA, 1938
RFA.No. 588 of 2014 ()
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 186/2012 of SUB COURT, KOYILANDY DATED 23-05-2014
APPELLANT/
PLAINTIFF IN OS NO.186/2012 -SUB COURT, KOYILANDY:
ABDUL NASAR, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. AMMED, TRADER, THAYYULLA KELOTH HOUSE, AYANCHERY AMSOM, POST THAROPOYIL, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 541.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.KRISHNAN SRI.PARTHASARATHY
RESPONDENT/ DEFENDANT IN OS NO.186/2012- SUB COURT, KOYILANDY:
KIZHPATT ANDRU, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. KUNHAMMED, TRADER, PURAMERI VILLAGE, POST KADAMERI, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, PIN-673 101.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ABDUL NASAR
- respondent
KIZHPATT ANDRU
Coram
V.CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court