Gopakakrishnan v. Anilkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular first appeal arising from a settlement memorandum was disposed of by allowing the appeal and refunding the court fee upon the parties reaching a settlement.
What did the court decide?
Settlement accepted; appeal dismissed/settled; court fee refunded to appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/21ST ASWINA, 1938
RFA.No. 305 of 2015 ()
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 5/2012 of PRL.SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA DATED 20-12-2014
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. THAKARAMKUNNATHU MADHAVAN, PADIYOOR VILLAGE & DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN
SMT.S.ANJUSHA
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
ANILKUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. KUZHIPARAMBIL PADMANABAN, KUNNAPPILLY DESOM, MELOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gopalakrishnan
- respondent
Anilkumar
Coram
V. Chitambaresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court