Sri.Mohanan v. Sri.Joshy
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular First Appeal challenging a civil decree was disposed of after the parties settled the dispute through mediation. The appeal was dismissed based on the settlement agreement.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of based on the parties' settlement agreement dated 09.12.2015. The appellant is entitled to a refund of the court fee.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/23RD POUSHA, 1937
RFA.No. 454 of 2003 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS NO.54/1999 of ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,NORTH PARAVUR DATED 26-07-2003
APPELLANT(S)/DEFENDANT:
SRI.MOHANAN, S/O.NARAYANAN, CHAKKAMMATH, THURUTHISSERY KARA, NEDUMBASSERY VILLAGE, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI E.T.HOCHIMIN, CHAKKAMMATH HOUSE, THURUTHISSERY, MEIKKAD P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR SRI.P.NARAYANAN SRI.M.P.HARIKUMAR (NEDUMBASSERY)
RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
SRI. JOSHY, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, VALLATH HOUSE, CHENGAMANAD KARA, NEDUMBASSERY VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SRI. MOHANAN
- respondent
SRI. JOSHY
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court