Mary Kutty v. Sadasivan
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the process remitted to the appellant had not been completed by the date of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/29TH MAGHA, 1937
RFA.No. 36 of 2006
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 973/1994 of PRL.SUB COURT, THRISSUR DATED 12-09-2001
APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:
- MARY KUTTY, W/O.P.P.GEORGE, POOTHULLI HOUSE, VANIAMPARA.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
- T.C.CHACKO, S/O.CHACKO, THEKKEPUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, VANIAMPARA.P.O THRISSUR DISTRICT.
- P.P.MATHEW, S/O.P.V.PAILY, POOTHULLI HOUSE, VANIAMPARA.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mary Kutty
- appellant
T.C.Chacko
- appellant
P.P.Mathew
- respondent
Sadasiavan
- respondent
Dr.Sivanjanavally
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court