C.K. Sanil v. Antony
Case brief
What is this about?
Two appeals arising from the dismissal of interim applications under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC were dismissed as the main suit was still pending, leaving the matter for adjudication during the trial.
What did the court decide?
Appeals dismissed; matter left for adjudication in the suit.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/27TH MAGHA, 1937
FAO.No. 397 of 2012 ()
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 7.12.2012 IN IA.6439/12 IN OS.920/12 OF THE IIIRD ADDITIONAL SUB JUDGE, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS:
- C.K. SANIL AGED 38 YEARS S/O.C.C KUNHIKANNAN, MANAGING TRUSTEE ERNAKULAM TAXI DRIVERS UNION TRUST, ERNAKULAM, ROOM NO 11, MARUTI VILAS, CANNON SHED ROAD, KOCHI 682011 ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, RESIDING AT CHEMBAPILLI HOUSE, VARAPPUZHA LANDING POST, PIN 683517.
- K.J YESUDAS, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH SECRETARY, ERNAKULAM TAXI DRIVERS UNION TRUST, ERNAKULAM ROOM NO 11, MARUTI VILAS, CANNON SHED ROAD, KOCHI 682011 ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, RESIDING AT KOCHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, SILPASALA ROAD, VYTTILA POST THYKKODAM PIN 682019
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeals against the dismissal of interim applications in a pending suit should be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C.K. Sanil and others
- respondent
Antony
Coram
Antony Dominic
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court