M.Bhaskara Panciker v. Sivan
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant died and the legal heirs failed to implead within the granted timeframe of two weeks.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed; pending interlocutory applications are dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2016/1ST CHAITHRA, 1938
RFA.No. 21 of 2006 ( C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS NO. 104/2000 of I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR DATED 30-09-2005
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT::
(*) M. BHASKARA PANICKER,
DIED ( RECORDED)
AGED 78 YEARS, S/O. KANDAN NAIR, CHINGAPURATHU HOUSE RESIDING AT THAYYUR VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT.
*IT IS RECORDED THAT THE APPELLANT IS NO MORE, VIDE ORDER DT.6.1.16 AND JUDGMENT DT. 21.3.16.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. BHASKARA PANICKER
- respondent
SIVAN
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court