Bhaskaran v. S.Ananthamani
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to incomplete service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2016/1ST CHAITHRA, 1938
RFA.No. 134 of 2004 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS NO. 191/2000 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD DATED 19-09-2003
APPELLANT(S)/PLAINTIFF.:
BHASKARAN,S/O.PAPPAN, RESIDING AT VALIYAVALLAMPATHY VILLAGE, KOZHINJAMPARA CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SMT.M.R.VALSA SRI.SREEKANTH.K.R SMT.G.GEETHISHA
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANTS:
R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & A.HARIPRASAD, JJ.
R.F.A. No.134 of 2004
Dated this the 21st day of March, 2016
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
This appeal was filed in the year 2004. In 2013, twice time was granted to cure the defect to make the service complete. However, even as on today, the service is remaining incomplete. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.
A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.
cks
BHASKARAN, S/O.PAPPAN
K.S.ANANTHAMANI
C.MANIKANTAN
KANNAN
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
ANTONY DOMINIC
A. HARIPRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court