In this regular first appeal, the High Court of Kerala held that the matter was settled by mediation. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of on the basis of the memorandum of settlement entered into by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/11TH KARTHIKA, 1938
RFA.No. 172 of 2014 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 119/2010 of SUB COURT, VADAKARA DATED 26-10-2013
APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
RFA.No. 172 of 2014
-2-
R1,R2 & 4 BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNAN ADV. SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY R3 BY ADV. SRI.SRINATH GIRISH
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH & ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JJ.
-------------------------------------------------R.F.A.No.172 OF 2014
-------------------------------------------------DATED THIS THE 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016
JUDGMENT
Chitambaresh, J.
The matter has been settled on mediation by the parties. A memorandum of settlement has been entered into. The
terms thereof shall form part of this judgment.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE
Sd/- ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE
dsn
True copy
P.S. to Judge
CHERUVALATH YOUSUF & ORS.
PEEDIKAYILAKATH ABDUL RASHEED & ORS.
V.CHITAMBARESH
ANIL K.NARENDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
