Allowed
Muhammed Rafi v. Sayed Ali
Kerala HCRFA/136/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/12TH KARTHIKA, 1938
RFA.No.136 of 2009 ( )
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 267/2004 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOLLAM DATED 26-06-2008
APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANT:
RFA.No. 136 of 2009 ( )
R7 BY ADV. SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI R7 BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P R1,R 3 BY ADV. SRI.S.ABHILASH
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH & ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JJ.
-------------------------------------------------------R.F.A.No.136 of 2009
Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2016
JUDGMENT
Chitambaresh, J.
A memorandum of settlement has been arrived at between the appellants and respondents 1, 3 and 5. The terms thereof will form part of this judgment. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
It is made clear that the appellate decree will bind only
those who are parties to the settlement.
Sd/-
V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE
Sd/- ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE
skj
True copy
P.A to Judge
MUHAMMED RAFI
SAEED ABOOBACKER
SAYED ALI
SHAMSATH
KHADIJA MEHAR BANU
SALITHA
V. CHITAMBARESH
ANIL K. NARENDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court