Reji M.P. v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the DRT-I Ernakulam must dispose of I.A. no.1308/2016 and O.A. no.526/2014 within three months from receipt of this judgment to prevent undue delay.
What did the court decide?
Direction to DRT-I, Ernakulam to dispose of I.A. 1308/2016 and O.A. 526/2014 within three months from receipt of judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/16TH BHADRA, 1938
OP (DRT).No. 80 of 2016 (O)
OA. NO.526/2014 OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.
PETITIONER(S):
REJI M.POULOSE, S/O. POULOSE, AGED 44, MALAYIL HOUSE, FLAT NO.10-C, ASSET HOMES APARTMENTS (CITY BAY), CHATHARI, THRIPPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 301.
BY ADVS.SMT.M.R.REENA, SRIP.S.SUJETH.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., THRIPPUNITHURA BRANCH, DOOR NO.638 A, P.B. NO.17, THRIPPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 071.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Debts Recovery Tribunal should be directed to dispose of the pending applications within a stipulated time.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
REJI M.POULOSE
- respondent
THE BRANCH MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., THRIPPUNITHURA BRANCH
- respondent
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/ CHIEF MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court