Vinu T.P. v. Indusind Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala, on the same day of admission, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the submission of the petitioner's counsel without detailed reasoning.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/15TH BHADRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 9794 of 2016 (Y)
PETITIONER:
VINU T.P., AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.T.K.PARAMU, THACHAKKARAPARAMBIL, JANATHA ROAD, VYTTILA-682 019.
BY ADV. SRI.DILISH JOHN
RESPONDENT:
THE MANAGER, INDUSND BANK LIMITED, GOWRI NARAYANAN, 40/8200, OPP. JAYALAKSHMI SILKS., M.G.ROAD, KOCHI-682 035.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous and should be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinu T.P.
- respondent
The Manager, IndusInd Bank Limited
Coram
A.M. Shaffique
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court