James v. Laisa
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, on the basis of a request by counsel, granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/16TH MAGHA, 1937
OP(C).No. 4407 of 2013 (O)
IA 5145/2013 IN OS 370/2012 of III ADDL.SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
-------------
PETITIONER :
------------------
JAMES, S/O.ALEXANDER, THYKKOTTATHIL HOUSE, KOTHAD P.O., KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE, KOCHI - 27.
BY ADVS.SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR
SRI.CIBI THOMAS
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
James
- respondent
Laisa
- respondent
Harold Nicholson
- respondent
Johny Thykoottathil
- respondent
Pious G.Thykooothil
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court